Shift to paperless schools ‘lacks empirical support’ – experts

Shift to paperless schools ‘lacks empirical support’ – experts

The shift to “paperless schools” lacks strong empirical support and could potentially have a negative impact on students’ literacy, experts have warned.

Dr Anabela Malpique of Murdoch University and Associate Professor Deborah Pino Pasternak of University of Canberra conducted the study, which involved 154 students and 24 teachers across seven Perth schools. 

The researchers conducting the research were also assisted by Dr Magda Sofia Roberto, their statistical consultant.

They found that handwriting automaticity, or fluency, predicted writing quality and reading skills a year later and warned that schools should not rush to phase out pens and paper in favour of fully digital setups.

“A growing body of research argues specific cognitive benefits of handwriting during early childhood, including brain development, working memory, translation of thought-to-script, and overall writing quality and production,” the researchers said.

“While it might be tempting to dismiss the importance of handwriting as simply cosmetic, handwriting in fact underpins many higher functions of writing”.

The researchers note that poor handwriting automaticity hinders vocabulary selection, ideation and revision, while also affecting motivation, writing development and, in turn, academic success.

Dr Malpique and Professor Pasternak said their study’s findings are well aligned with recent neuroimaging studies, question the empirical foundations of digital only efforts in schools today. 

“In a time when handwriting is being replaced by digital writing devices, research is showing that such a move could be counterproductive,” they noted.
Of particular concern to Dr Malpique and Professor Pasternak were the teaching practices reported. 

Year One students spent less than 50 minutes per day practicing writing, which is the minimum recommended, while across the board there was great variability in the time students spent on writing. Writing time and instruction ranged from 30 to 120 minutes per week.

The researchers also note that Australian teachers may be focusing too much on basic skills rather than teaching writing processes such as planning for writing and learning strategies to revise the quality of their texts.

“This may be problematic since research with primary students suggests that writing instruction in early education should include the teaching of basic writing skills and the teaching of writing processes in the same instructional protocol,” Dr Malpique and Professor Pasternak said.